INTERNATIONAL VICTIMS OF RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION:CHRISTOPHER H.
SMITH.
Statement of Representative Christopher H. Smith Chairman, Subcommittee
on International Operations and Human Rights June 16, 1998
Victims of Religious Persecution Around the World
Today's hearing of the Subcommittee on International Operations and Human
Rights is for the purpose of taking the testimony of five witnesses to
religious persecution. These are not government officials or even analysts
from non-governmental organizations. Rather, they are people who have
witnessed religious persecution first-hand --- who have seen close friends or
relatives imprisoned, tortured, even executed for their faith, or who have
suffered such horrors themselves.
This is the latest in a series of Subcommittee hearings focusing in whole
or in part on persecution of religious believers. Other hearings have focused
on worldwide anti-Semitism, on the persecution of Christians around the world,
on the 1995 massacre of Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica, on the enslavement of
black Christians in Sudan, and on the use of torture against religious
believers and other prisoners of conscience.
We have heard from Palden Gyatso, a Tibetan Buddhist monk who displayed
the instruments of torture used against him by his Chinese communist jailers;
from Hasan Nuhanovic, a Muslim who unsuccessfully begged United Nations
peacekeepers not to turn his mother, father, and brother over to the murderous
Bosnian Serb militia; from a Russian Jewish member of parliament who observed
that "anti-Semitism was the first industry to be privatized" in post-Soviet
Russia; from Karen [Kah-RENN] refugees whose villages in Thailand were
burned by the Burmese military dictatorship, which openly used their Christian
religion as an excuse to conduct cross-border raids against them; and from
Christians and Buddhists subjected to imprisonment and torture by the
Communist governments of China and Vietnam. Today's witnesses include a
Catholic, a Protestant, a Muslim, a Buddhist, and a Bahai, all with
compelling and recent evidence that religious persecution is not a problem
that will go away if we just pretend it is not there.
In their prepared testimony, several of today's witnesses make clear that
the United States should continue to press for an end to religious persecution
abroad. This is important, because the Clinton Administration and some
business people who oppose the Freedom from Religious Persecution Act have
suggested that by publicly demanding an end to the mistreatment of these
people, we are more likely to hurt them than help them. Personally, I believe
it may be true in the short run that a totalitarian dictatorship used to
being coddled by the United States government will react with anger when
we suddenly insist that they behave in a civilized fashion. This is true
whether the issue is religious persecution, nuclear proliferation, or
anything else. In the long run, however, these governments will act in their
own self-interest. If we send a strong and consistent message that the
economic and other benefits of a close relationship with the United States
can be expected to flow to a government if and only if that government treats
its own people decently, we are likely to save lives and promote freedom
in the long run. This message has already been sent by the overwhelming
375 to 41 House vote in favor of the Freedom from Religious Persecution Act.
I hope that Senate passage and a Presidential signature will follow soon.
Whatever we do to other governments that persecute religious believers,
it is also important that the United States put its own house in order. One
way we can do this is to monitor and improve our treatment of refugees, with
special reference to religious refugees. Unfortunately, in recent years the
United States commitment to refugees --- both the amount we spend on
protection overseas, and the number of refugees we admit to the United States
--- has declined sharply. In the last four years, our State Department has
asked for and gotten a raise for itself every single year. Yet the only major
account in which the Department has not asked for an increase is the refugee
account. The Administration's fiscal year 1999 budget request for refugees
is $63 million lower than the amount we spent in fiscal year 1995. The number
of refugees admitted to the United States has gone down from 130,000 to
75,000 in only four years. These declining resettlement rates encourage
first-asylum countries to forcibly repatriate refugees to countries where
they face serious danger. For instance, in recent years we have seen Tibetan
Buddhists forced back from Nepal into the hands of the Chinese Communists,
and Iranian Christians and Bahais forced back to Iran from Turkey. We need
to reverse that trend and restore the American tradition of safe haven for
the oppressed. In the words of President Ronald Reagan, the United States
can and must be a shining city on a hill.
Finally, I want to address those critics who suggest that by paying special
attention to religious persecution, we somehow diminish the importance of
those who have suffered persecution for other reason. Nothing could be further
from the truth, and it is no accident that those in Congress who have been
strongest in their support of persecuted believers have also stood up for
the rights of those who have suffered for their race, nationality, or
political opinions. I do want to suggest, though, that religious persecution
is deserving of special attention because totalitarian governments often
come down harder on religious believers than anyone else. This is because
nothing threatens such regimes more than faith. In the modern world ---
in which the rhetoric of cultural relativism and moral equivalence is so
often used to make the difference between totalitarianism and freedom seem
like just a matter of opinion --- the strongest foundation for the absolute
and indivisible nature of human rights is the belief that these rights are
not bestowed by governments or international organizations, but by God. And
people who are secure in their relationship with God do not intimidate easily.
So we must remind ourselves, and then we must remind our government, that
human rights policy is not just a subset of trade policy, and refugee
protection is not just an inconvenient branch of immigration policy. The
protection of refugees, the fight for human rights around the world, are
about recognizing that good and evil really exist in the world. They are
also about recognizing that we are all brothers and sisters. If we recognize
these truths, we can build a coalition to preserve and strengthen United
States policies designed to protect our witnesses today --- and to protect
all others who are persecuted because of their religion, race, nationality,
or political beliefs --- and to restore these policies to the place they
deserve as a top priority in American foreign policy.
©Copyright 1998, Congressional Testimony
|