Faith Stories: Where Reason And Religion Can Coexist
By Reynaldo Pareja
Saturday, October 3, 1998; Page B07
* This is another in a series of first-person accounts of readers'
religious or spiritual journeys. Stories have been edited for space
and clarity.
Changing one's faith is not easy. It involves a profound rupture with
the beliefs one grew up with and trusted to answer those anguishing
questions about the origins of oneself, the universe and the creator.
My own confrontation with the beliefs of my parents, and their parents,
began around age 28. I had become deeply conscious over the previous 20
years that Christianity, despite its basis in 2,000 years of "religious
truth," was not answering my questions satisfactorily, and I no longer
felt secure and committed to its defense.
I started my inquiry like many other believers. I asked those
impertinent questions about those
dogmas in the Roman Catholic Church, in which I was raised, that
systematically seemed to
contradict reasonable analysis. Rather than being the essence of what
Christ said, these
teachings are elaborate interpretations of theologians who find answers
that are "correct"
because they agree with the traditional say-so of other theologians.
The most single aberration of the historical development of Christian
dogma is its fight with
scientific reason. How many times has the church had to rectify its
myopia concerning
scientific findings that were viewed through dogmatic lenses? One of the
most famous: Galileo
and his obligation to renounce publicly his scientific affirmation that
the Earth revolved around
the Sun, and not vice versa.
In the Baha'i faith, which I joined 10 months ago, I have found a belief
system that affirms
there should be no conflict between science and religion. One supports
the other; the other
gives the one its full meaning.
Man's reasoning is God's gift. Finding the scientific truths about the
universe, the origin of the
cosmos, the inner depth of the atoms or a cell's DNA structure attests
to the grandeur of this
gift. It is not cause for an inner conflict between man's religious
beliefs and his capacity to find
the essence of the reality he is always questioning.
I also had to struggle with Christianity's teaching that its Revealed
Truth is the only one possible.
The Baha'i faith affirms that all divine revelations from God, coming to
us through its
recognized prophets -- Krishna, Moses, Abraham, Jesus, Muhammad and
Baha'u'llah -- are
not only true but historical. That is, the Revealed Truth is progressive
and adapted to each stage
of humanity's evolution. Each new prophet adds a new aspect to the
previous body of beliefs,
and these become the new guiding truths of humanity's next phase of
evolution.
Baha'u'llah, the prophet of the Baha'i faith, a century ago openly
affirmed this process was the
essence of being a manifestation of God: the initiation of a new cycle.
No religion, however
inspired, can exhaust all revelations of God's innermost reality. Nor
can it say it has received
the revelation which will be good for all of mankind for all ages to
come.
The present cycle started with Baha'u'llah's Revelation: the oneness of
the human race.
As a Christian, I could not accept that there has to be a "cadre of
specialists" (theologians and
priests) to interpret for me that which God has revealed, as if I were
incapable of making a
sound rational statement. As a Baha'i, I am taught that I can understand
the revelation of
Baha'u'llah by just reading and meditating on the prophet's sacred
books.
In the Baha'i faith, a new cycle has been born with "new tidings" for
this age, and I want to be
part of it. It has given me the chance to find the answers to my deepest
questions without
having to renounce the best that Christ taught.
Reynaldo Pareja, 54, is a health communications specialist with the
Academy for Educational
Development. He and his wife, Patricia, both natives of Colombia, live
in Vienna with their
two teenage boys.
© Copyright 1998 The Washington Post