. |
The current state of religious freedom
Source: International Bulletin of Missionary Research
Publication date: 2001-04-01
Arrival time: 2001-05-10
During the late 1990s and into the new millennium, the overall
situation of religious freedom in the world has deteriorated. It is
particularly bad in the larger Asian countries such as China, India,
Pakistan, and Indonesia and in other largepopulation countries such
as Nigeria. Western Europe has also become less religiously free
because of widespread concern over "cults." Some areas, such as Latin
America, have improved. Others such as Africa, the former Soviet
Union, and the Middle East have remained fairly stable, the latter
two at a low level of religious freedom, and the last having one of
the poorest records of the world.
Another important feature is the increasing religious element in
conflict. The fighting between Israel and the Palestinians reflects
much more religious rhetoric, identification, and claims than did the
intifada of the late 1980s, and more than the overtly secular/
nationalist struggles of the 1960s and 1970s. Similar tendencies have
been manifest in Kashmir, Nigeria, and Indonesia.
The Spread of Religious Freedom
Religious freedom and religious persecution affect all religious
groups. A variety of groups-Christians and animists in Sudan, Baha'is
in Iran, Ahmadiyas in Pakistan, Buddhists in Tibet, and Fahm Gong in
China-are now perhaps the most intensely persecuted, while Christians
as a group are the most widely persecuted. But there is no religious
group in the world that does not suffer to some degree because of its
beliefs. Religions, whether large, such as Christianity, Islam,
Hinduism, or Buddhism, or small, such as Baha'i, Jehovah's Witness,
or Judaism, all experience some degree of repression. In many cases
restrictions come from people who are members of the same general
religious group but who are part of a different subgroup. Thus
nonOrthodox Christians in Russia, Greece, and Armenia suffer
discrimination from the Orthodox, while Shiite Muslims in Pakistan
and Afghanistan suffer persecution and even death from some of the
dominant Sunni groups.
Religious freedom is also not confined to any one area or
continent. There are relatively free countries in every continent
(see figure 1). South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, South Africa, Botswana,
and Namibia are freer than France and Belgium. Latin America also has
relatively high scores. There are absolutely no grounds for thinking
that religious freedom is an exclusively Western concern or
achievement.
Some Westerners and Third World leaders in China and Vietnam
emphasize "economic rights," "Asian values," and "cultural
relativism" and denigrate civil rights, such as religious freedom, as
quasiluxuries that need be advanced, if at all, only when more basic
needs such as food and shelter have been achieved. Proponents of
these views should be challenged with the fact that several Asian
countries, such as South Korea and Taiwan, which have a background of
poverty and exploitation, and with Confucian traditions as strong as
China and Vietnam, both value and successfully defend religious
freedom, and that desperately poor African countries can do the same.
Religious freedom is desired throughout the world and has been
achieved throughout the world. It is a moral travesty of the highest
order to pretend that because people are hungry and cold it is
legitimate to repress and persecute them as well.
Regional Variations
While high levels of religious freedom occur in every area, there
are still large regional variations. The Western European and North
Atlantic area countries covered in this survey all score from 1 to 3
and thus show a high level of religious freedom. (This survey covers
seventy-five countries, which contain approximately 90 percent of the
world's population. Following Freedom House practice, I will call
countries with a score of 1-3 "free," 4-5 "partly free," and 6-7 "not
free.") The countries of Latin America also score well; all those
listed are "free," except Colombia, Mexico, and Cuba. A similar
pattern occurs in sub-Saharan Africa, where several countries score
"free"; Nigeria ("5") and Tanzania ("41 score "partly free." In the
African case, however, we cover relatively few countries, and it is
probable that other countries (such as war-torn Angola, Congo,
Liberia, or Sierra Leone) would not rate well. Yet, given the fact that several
African countries are "free," one must conclude that
there is nothing endemic to the continent preventing other countries
from doing as well.
Figure 1.
The countries of eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union cover
a very wide spread, from Estonia, rated a 1, to Turkmenistan, rated a
7. There are countries at each level, with those bordering the Baltic
(Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland), as well as Hungary,
Romania, and Ukraine, rated "free." Most countries (ten out of
nineteen) are at the intermediate levels of 4 and 5. Other Freedom
House surveys indicate that these countries are in transition, cannot
remain at an intermediate level, and are likely to move to higher or
lower levels.
Asian countries also show a wide spread, though with more
countries at the "partly free" and "not free" levels. East Asian
countries (Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, and the Philippines, as well
as Mongolia) score best for religious freedom. The poorest scores are
registered by Communist powers (China, Tibet, North Korea, and
Vietnam) and East Timor, where chaos rules. The only other "not free"
countries surveyed are Burma and Bhutan.
The area from northern Africa through the eastern Mediterranean to
East Asia exhibits a nearly complete range of scores. Israel
(excluding the occupied territories) scores a 3, Lebanon and Greece
and Morocco a 4, and Egypt and Turkey a 5. The other countries score
6 (Mauritania, Pakistan) or 7 (Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Iran). These
findings (as well as those for other areas) are consistent with the
general area findings for all political rights and civil liberties
contained in Freedom House's general survey "Freedom in the World
2000" (available at http// www.freedomhouse.org/survey/2000, which
also explains the criteria for assigning the scores 1-7).
Religious Variations
There is similar variation in the religious background of
religious freedom. This is obviously a complex matter, since current
regimes may reflect comparatively little of a country's religious
background. China, Tibet, and Vietnam all have a largely Buddhist
background, but current religious repression comes at the hand of
Communist regimes, which profess to be atheistic materialists. Turkey
has an Islamic background, but the present government is an
aggressively secular one that represses peaceful Muslim expression.
Similarly, largely Catholic East Timor had, until the fall of 1999,
been under Indonesian occupation, and the current lack of religious
freedom reflects the damage and chaos left in the aftermath of
Indonesian military withdrawal rather than explicit faults in the
current administration. A survey taken thirty years ago would have
found many traditionally Christian countries in eastern Europe and
the former Soviet Union "not free," since they were ruled by
Communists. Nevertheless the overall patterns can be revealing (see
figure 2).
Historically Christian countries tend to score well in religious
freedom, with an average rating of 3. This result parallels other
Freedom House findings, which indicate that traditionally Christian
countries have tended to score well on political rights and civil
liberties. Of the thirty-four countries covered in the survey that
can be rated as religiously "free" (i.e., scoring 1-3), twenty-nine
are traditionally Christian. Conversely only one of the forty-two
traditionally Christian countries surveyed (Cuba) registers on the
"not free" end of the scale. Within Christianity, Protestantism tends
to score better than Catholicism, and both score better than
Orthodoxy.
The other religiously "free" countries surveyed are Israel and
four countries of largely Buddhist background-Japan, Mongolia, South
Korea, and Taiwan. This finding suggests that a Buddhist tradition
also has had a tendency to produce relatively high religious freedom.
The Buddhist countries with markedly poor scores reflect the
Communist regimes in China, Tibet, North Korea, and Vietnam. If these
four are excluded, the remaining countries, except Bhutan and Burma,
score relatively well. These patterns are also congruent with the
findings of "Freedom in the World." There is, however, some
difference with respect to Hindu countries. Whereas both India and
Nepal have relatively free elections, they have tended to score lower
on civil liberties generally and, in this survey, score even lower on
religious freedom. In Nepal the difference is not great, but in India
the difference reflects the upsurge in India within recent years of a
militant and intolerant Hinduism, coupled with violent attacks on
religious minorities, especially Christians.
The religious areas with the largest current restrictions on
religious freedom are the Islamic countries. This finding parallels
problems with democracy and civil liberties, but the negative trend
with respect to religion is even stronger. No traditionally Islamic
country surveyed is religiously "free," while half of those surveyed
are "not free." Four countries (Iran, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and
Turkmenistan) score a 7, \the lowest category for religious freedom.
This situation may ultimately show some improvement, since Indonesia,
the country with by far the world's largest Muslim population,
appeared to become freer following its 1999 election, and Nigeria,
which is about half Muslim, may also be establishing itself as a
democracy. In both these cases, however, the transition to democracy
is coupled with large-scale regional religious violence (in northern
Nigeria and in Ambon in Indonesia) that has been exacerbated by a
minority of Islamic radicals.
Figure 2. 1
It is clear from this survey, as well as State Department reports
and other surveys, that violations of religious freedom worldwide are
massive, widespread, and, in the last five years, increasing.
Moreover, with the collapse of Communism, any regime looking for an
alternative to "Westernization," "globalization," or "capitalism" is
now more likely to look to religious traditions as a source of
legitimacy or national unity. Many of these regimes are now also
governed by leaders who, unlike earlier elite generations under
colonialism, have not been exposed to Western education.
These trends suggest four other conclusions. First, that religious
repression in the world is likely to increase. Second, that attention
to and action on religious freedom has been comparatively weak.
Third, that the important role of religion in conflicts and in
political orders has been comparatively neglected. Fourth, that both
of these situations are now beginning to change, a change we hope
this present survey will accelerate.
Paul Marshall is Senior Fellow at the Center for Religious
Freedom, Freedom House, Washington, D.C. He is the General Editor of
Religious Freedom in the World: A Global Report on Freedom and
Persecution (Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 2000), from which this
article is adapted.
©Copyright 2001, Overseas Ministries Study Center
|
. |