'Abdu'l-Bahá: The Centre of the Covenant of Bahá'u'lláh
Author: H. M. Balyuzi
Publisher: London, George Ronald, 1971
pp. xii, 560, 14 pl. £1.75.
Review by: L.P. Elwell-Sutton
[page 166]
H. M. Balyuzi's book is the second of a trilogy that began
with his study of Baha'ullah (published in 1963) and is to be completed
with a biography of Sayyid Muhammad 'Ali the Bab. Thus the three great
figures of Bahá'ísm are being treated in detail for the first time since
E. G. Browne laid down his pen. Indeed, Browne had little to say about
Baha'ullah and 'Abdu'l-Bahá, and in the view of orthodox Bahá'ís (as
expressed by Mr. Balyuzi in an earlier work) [footnote 1: Edward
Granville Browne and the Bahá'í faith, London, 1970.] was misled by
dissident elements in the community, notably the followers of Mirza
Yahya Subh-i Azal.
[page 167]
As the man whose leadership of the Bahá'í community
saw the spread of Bahá'ísm throughout the world, 'Abdu'l-Bahá is held
in as much reverence as his two predecessors. But the biographer has
the further advantage that there were many more chroniclers and
witnesses available to record the details of his life. This comes out
very clearly in Mr. Balyuzi's work, which - for all the charm and fluency
that the author brings to it - is essentially a compilation of material,
press reports, personal memoirs, speeches, and so on, from a wide
range of sources, most of them already published in one place or
another, and here usefully brought together for the first time.
This method of composition is reflected in the shape of
the book, almost half of which is devoted to 'Abdu'l-Bahá's two-year
tour of Europe and America from August, 1911, to June, 1913. While
obviously from the point of view of world Bahá'ísm this journey was of
immense consequence, consolidating as it did the establishment of the
faith in the West and especially in the United States, the reader may
feel that there are rather too many names (and even addresses) dropped,
rather too many visits recorded to the houses of private individuals
whose identity and significance is not made clear. In a work of over
500 pages some of this detail would hardly be missed, except by the
relatives and friends of the persons concerned. Indeed, this is not the
only point at which the book takes on the air of a "house" publication
written more for the faithful than for the outside world. The reverent
attitude to the subject of the biography is understandable, but the as
yet unconverted reader may feel that he is being asked to take too much
on trust. True, there are generous quotations from 'Abdu'l-Bahá's
speeches and letters, especially those belonging to the American tour;
but sometimes these stop short just when they are getting interesting,
to leave one with a surely false impression of empty platitude and
generalization. For instance, on p. 257 and again on p. 264 we hear of a
"scheme for dealing with the superfluous wealth of a nation", but we
never learn what it was.
It may be this kind of omission that gives the feeling
that, while there is nothing in 'Abdu'l-Bahá's teaching that any
reasonable person of good will could object to, there is equally nothing
to get your teeth into - or to get its teeth into you. "The peace of the
world must be brought about by international agreement. All nations
must agree to disarm simultaneously" (p. 258). How may international
conferences have foundered on that shoal! "This is the prime duty of the
proprietors of newspapers, to obliterate misunderstandings betwixt
religions and races and nativities, and promote the oneness of mankind"
(p. 273). Quite so.
The rather fulsome tone of the references to 'Abdu'l-Bahá
and his supporters is counterbalanced by the severity of the terms used
to describe their enemies, particularly Baha'ullah's half-brother Mirza
Yahya, and 'Abdu'l-Bahá's half-brother Mirza Muhammad 'Ali. Without
necessarily questioning the role played by these two, the non-Bahá'í
reader may wish for rather more substantial evidence than "astounding
perfidy", "odious deeds", "dire mischief". Mr. Balyuzi, however, regards
these charges as so self-evidently true that he does not even think it
necessary to refute the countercharges, quoted very fully and honestly,
made by them against 'Abdu'l-Bahá himself.
There are some minor faults. Mr. Balyuzi retains the
idiosyncrasies of transliteration that have marked his earlier books. In
particular, his consistent use of -i- for the Persian sound more
nearly rendered by -e- is singularly inappropriate when it stands
for the Arabic -a- in such words as siyyid, dawlih, suriy-i-
ghusn, and is scarcely warranted by the Persian pronunciation, let
alone for purely Arabic words and names, like Ramlih for the
Egyptian city of Ramla. For the most part (but not always) he quite
properly retains the original spelling in quotations, but it seems
unnecessarily pedantic to gloss such forms as "Koran" (Qur'an) and
"sheiks" (Shaykhs). While his footnotes and references are very full and
thorough, there are occasional lapses; for instance, it is not enough on
p. 419 to say that "Kayl was a measure for grain" (obvious from the
context) without adding its modern equivalent (36 litres). One would
also have been glad of a glossary of Bahá'í titles and technical terms,
giving both Persian and English forms.
The fact remains that, in spite of a few surface faults,
Mr. Balyuzi's book provides an admirable and readable account of a
major religious figure of our times, virtually ignored outside the body
of his adherents, but obviously able to inspire fanatical devotion in
those who met him. One does not need to be a Bahá'í to recognize the
importance and value of his teaching, and to feel surprise that no
orientalist after Browne should have devoted serious attention to this
new faith from the East. As a Persian with a scholarly knowledge of his
native culture, as a Bahá'í of long standing and high rank, and as a man
of affairs with extensive experience and
[page 168]
understanding of the West (as well as an excellent command of
English), Mr. Balyuzi is just the man to take on the task.