. | . | . | . | ||||||||||||||||||||
. |
Introduction I started out wondering about the particular rulers to whom the letters were sent. My first question was: What does every school-age child know about these monarchs? In order to answer that, I consulted every child's favorite reference, World Book Encyclopedia, in the various articles on the monarchs. The first thing I discovered was that most of them were considered, at some point, to be liberal thinkers and, in some cases, potential reformers. What happened? For the purposes of my timeline, I was mostly interested in the European monarchs because it was the process of the rise of the nation state that I wanted to track. I was not as interested in Queen Victoria because England was already a stable, single entity; and I was not as interested in Russia because political change there was slower. The ultimate questions I want to explore are: What are some of the pivotal historical events from 1844-1871 that gave rise to the nation state? Are there any historical parallels, implications for our own time period? That is the background, the point from which I began, and the point from which my essay begins. I believe that there are significant historical similarities between the time in which we are living, and the time in which the Báb and Bahá'u'lláh lived and exhorted the rulers of the earth to turn their attention toward God and His Manifestations. History has given us some crucial lessons, if you will pay attention to them. By the time the Báb declared His Mission to the world, civilization was already changing. By 1844, especially in western Europe, there had been some significant changes in the way people thought and interacted. Western Europe had experienced 'enlightenment.' A new age of skepticism had arisen, and old structures and traditional ways of doing things were falling away. Compared to even 50 years earlier, people were living longer and in better health; more people were literate and more were formally educated; an influential, commercial, middle class had arisen; technological advances allowed more profitable use of land and resources; industrialization was luring more people to city centers; many countries had colonies or trading partners in other parts of the world; monarchies and leaders still spoke of 'divine right' but increasingly groups were forming to draw attention to the needs of the 'common man.' While many citizens were still disenfranchised, the will of the populous was being addressed by elected and appointed officials. In England, Parliament had real legislative power. The Bahá'í writings tell us that when the Manifestation appears, a fresh wave of energy accelerates the growth of God's Plan for His creatures. The Báb's announcement came at a time when western European countries were coalescing from a collection of squabbling, warring principalities into true nations. The timeline below illustrates some of the changes that took place beginning with the Báb's Declaration in 1844. Of course, the process had begun much earlier, but it is the rapid acceleration toward the modern western European states with which we are familiar that caught my attention. This is a very skeletal timeline covering, in general, only 1844-1871 highlighting the rise of the nation states. The Promised Day Is Come gives a full account of what befell each of the recipients of Bahá'u'lláh's messages.
Between the 1860s and 1880s a number of societies of workers were formed to better conditions and increase their social/political power. Many of these societies acquired legal status between 1870 and 1900.
Bahá'u'lláh's letters to the rulers came at a crucial time in this process. Clearly, the old order of the day was giving way to a new, more egalitarian structure. Bahá'u'lláh warns the rulers that they must be aware of their responsibilities before God. They must turn toward God and His Manifestation for guidance; otherwise, they will be swept away along with the outmoded traditions and systems they represent. On one level, He may have had some hope the monarchs would heed His call. Of those to whom He wrote, all but Wilhelm I had shown some signs of liberality of thought. Thumbnail sketches from encyclopedia accounts seem to indicate that these rulers were, to a certain extent, in tune with their time. Pope Pius IX originally favored unification of the Italian States. He was elected pope because it was felt he was a liberal choice; however, continued threats to papal power caused him to become much more conservative. In 1864 he wrote "Syllabus of Errors" in which he condemned what he believed were errors of modern thought -- liberalism, rationalism, communism and socialism. By 1870 Italy had absorbed all the Papal States except the Vatican, the Lateran palaces and the papal villa at Castel Gandolfo. The pope shut himself inside the Vatican and considered himself a prisoner. Napoleon III wrote "The Extinction of Poverty" in 1844; this treatise proposed the government act to end poverty and suffering. In 1848 he was elected President of France but instead of working to end suffering and poverty, he spent the next four years consolidating power. He named himself Emperor in 1852. He was a dictator surrounded by dishonest men. The legislature and the press had no power or authority. After 1860, in an attempt to increase his popularity and power, he began to move in the direction of a liberal empire, but by then people had begun to demand a democracy. His policy unraveled as he entered into a number of unfortunate political alliances, skirmishes, and deceitful dealings which led, finally, to his defeat in 1870 by the Germans. Two days after his surrender, the revolutionists overthrew the empire. He died an exile in England in 1873. Alexander II was called the Czar liberator because he freed the Russian serfs in 1861. He also carried out judicial reforms, especially in the courts, and improved the financial administration. In addition, he ended censorship, permitted provincial representative assemblies, and promoted industrialization and railroad building. Alexander fought and defeated the Turks. Nevertheless, vigorous revolutionary leaders demanded further reforms and greater political and social power. In 1881 Alexander II was assassinated. He was followed by Alexander III who was much more autocratic and repressive. Franz Joseph was a popular ruler but also believed in military force. After Austria was defeated in the Seven Week's War of 1866, he adopted a much more liberal attitude allowing Hungarians equal rights which eventually led to the formation of the Austro-Hungarian empire in 1867. Victoria I was the most successful of the monarchs in that she saw the best interests of her subjects were the best interests of herself. When she became Queen, the English people had very little respect for the throne because the previous Kings had been profligate and unconcerned with the welfare of their subjects. Victoria proved to be hard-working and caring, but she realized her role was as a symbol of national tradition and pride. The real power in Britain, then as now, resided in the Parliament. Wilhelm I opposed constitutional reform and supported the policies of his Prime Minister, Bismarck, who united Germany through ruthless political and military tactics. Bismarck once declared that the great problems of his time would be solved through "blood and iron" not speeches and resolutions. By virtue of their positions and power, the rulers addressed by Bahá'u'lláh could have implemented great changes among their people and promulgated God's Plan through the whole world. Had they been prepared to turn to Bahá'u'lláh, God's Messenger for this day, they would have learned at His feet how to build the future world civilization. They would have been part of the solution to man's lack of true spirituality and separation from God rather than encouragers of disunity and disintegration. When the Kitáb-i-Aqdás appeared, they would have welcomed the guidance as a means of bringing about a peaceful union of their countries, their colonies, and the world -- a means of creating the Kingdom of God on earth for which they had been taught to pray in 'The Lord's Prayer.' But they rejected the Lord of the Age and utterly misunderstood His Message, so mankind is still struggling toward its goal of unity. The rulers of Bahá'u'lláh's day preoccupied themselves with earthly power. They could not suppress their egos, selfish desires, and thirst for personal power. Like Esau in the Old Testament, they bartered away their inheritance for a cup of stew. What is the implication for those us who live in 1998? The world is now at another critical juncture. In the 19th century separate, small, political entities came together to build the modern nations of the world. In this day, the nations are moving ever closer to the promised world commonwealth. I believe one lesson to be learned from the mistakes of those kings and rulers who were addressed by Bahá'u'lláh is that we must firmly put aside our own egos, material considerations and desires to concentrate on the spiritual and material needs of all mankind. Another lesson is that the leaders of thought will need the assistance of those who have the Message of God for this day. Our leaders may have difficulty disassociating themselves from the selfish desire for individual power. Unlike the kings and rulers in the 19th century, our leaders do not have the bounty of receiving the Word from the Manifestation Himself. Only Bahá'ís, the followers of Bahá'u'lláh, have the Message of God for this day. If we learn from the lessons of the past, Bahá'ís must realize our grave responsibility to accomplish what those who had material power failed to do in the past -- we must assist in the birth of God's Kingdom on Earth. "In these days, the most important of all things is the guidance of the nations and peoples of the world. Teaching the Cause is of utmost importance for it is the head corner-stone of the foundation itself." Will and Testament of 'Abdu'l-Bahá, p.10 "Every Bahá'í, however humble or inarticulate, must become intent on fulfilling his role as a bearer of the Divine Message. Indeed, how can a true believer remain silent while around us men cry out in anguish for truth, love and unity to descend upon this world?" Messages from the Universal House of Justice: 1963-1986, p. 154
"The Message of Bahá'u'lláh is God's guidance for mankind to overcome the
difficulties of this age of transition and move forward into the next stage
of its evolution, and human beings have the right to hear it.... The
slowness of the response of the world has caused and is causing great
suffering; hence the historical pressure upon Bahá'ís to exert every effort
to teach the Faith for the sake of their fellowmen."
Messages from the Universal House of Justice: 1963-1968, p. 514 Illustrated History of Europe: a Unique Portrait of Europe's Common History. Federic Delouche, ed. New York, Henry Holt and Company, 1992 Messages from the Universal House of Justice: 1963-1986. Wilmette, IL, Bahá'í Publishing Trust, 1996 Roberts, J.M., A History of Europe. New York, Allen Lane The Penguin Press, 1997 Shoghi Effendi, The Promised Day Is Come. Wilmette, IL, Bahá'í Publishing Trust, 1980 Taherzadeh, Adib, The Revelation of Bahá'u'lláh: Adrianople, 1963-68, Volume 2. Oxford, George Ronald, 1977 Taherzadeh, Adib, The Revelation of Bahá'u'lláh: 'Akká, The Early Years, 1968-77, Volume 3. Oxford, George Ronald, 1984 Toynbee, Arnold, Mankind and Mother Earth: A Narrative History of the World. New York, Oxford University Press, 1976 Will and Testament of 'Abdu'l-Bahá. Wilmette, IL., Bahá'í Publishing Trust, 1991 The World Book
|
. | |||||||||||||||||||||
. | . | ||||||||||||||||||||||