|
Contrast with Religions of the Past
|
1 |
We may vainly search in the records of the earliest beginnings
of any of the recognized religions of the past for episodes as thrilling
in their details, or as far-reaching in their consequences, as
those that illumine the pages of the history of this Faith. The
almost incredible circumstances attending the martyrdom of that
youthful Prince of Glory; the forces of barbaric repression which
this tragedy subsequently released; the manifestations of unsurpassed
heroism to which it gave rise; the exhortations and warnings
which have streamed from the pen of the Divine Prisoner in His
Epistles to the potentates of the Church and the monarchs and rulers
of the world; the undaunted loyalty with which our brethren are
battling in Muslim countries with the forces of religious orthodoxy
--these may be reckoned as the most outstanding features of what
the world will come to recognize as the greatest drama in the world's
spiritual history.
|
2 |
I need not recall, in this connection, the unfortunate episodes
that have, admittedly, and to a very great extent, marred the early
history of both Judaism and Islám. Nor is it necessary to stress the
damaging effect of the excesses, the rivalries and divisions, the
fanatical outbursts and acts of ingratitude that are associated with
the early development of the people of Israel and with the militant
career of the ruthless pioneers of the Faith of Muhammad.
|
3 |
It would be sufficient for my purpose to call attention to the
great number of those who, in the first two centuries of the Christian
era, "purchased an ignominious life by betraying the holy
Scriptures into the hands of the infidels," the scandalous conduct
of those bishops who were thereby branded as traitors, the discord
of the African Church, the gradual infiltration into Christian doctrine
of the principles of the Mithraic cult, of the Alexandrian
school of thought, of the precepts of Zoroastrianism and of Grecian
philosophy, and the adoption by the churches of Greece and of Asia
of the institutions of provincial synods of a model which they
borrowed from the representative councils of their respective
countries.
|
4 |
How great was the obstinacy with which the Jewish converts
among the early Christians adhered to the ceremonies of their ancestors,
and how fervent their eagerness to impose them on the
Gentiles! Were not the first fifteen bishops of Jerusalem all circumcised
Jews, and had not the congregation over which they presided
united the laws of Moses with the doctrine of Christ? Is it not a
fact that no more than a twentieth part of the subjects of the Roman
Empire had enlisted themselves under the standard of Christ before
the conversion of Constantine? Was not the ruin of the Temple,
in the city of Jerusalem, and of the public religion of the Jews,
severely felt by the so-called Nazarenes, who persevered, above a
century, in the practice of the Mosaic Law?
|
5 |
How striking the contrast when we remember, in the light of
the afore-mentioned facts, the number of those followers of
Bahá'u'lláh who, in Persia and the adjoining countries, had enlisted
at the time of His Ascension as the convinced supporters of His
Faith! How encouraging to observe the undeviating loyalty with
which His valiant followers are guarding the purity and integrity
of His clear and unequivocal teachings! How edifying the spectacle
of those who are battling with the forces of a firmly intrenched
orthodoxy in their struggle to emancipate themselves from the
fetters of an outworn creed! How inspiring the conduct of those
Muslim followers of Bahá'u'lláh who view, not with regret or
apathy, but with feelings of unconcealed satisfaction, the deserved
chastisement which the Almighty has inflicted upon those twin
institutions of the Sultanate and the Caliphate, those engines of
despotism and sworn enemies of the Cause of God!
|